The anti-sunshine gang intensifies its attacks on the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force in City Hall

Sup. Scott Wiener leads the charge against sunshine in City Hall

By Bruce B. Brugmann   (with special sunshine vendetta chronology by Richard Knee) 

The Guardian story in the current issue demonstrates in 96 point tempo bold how important the glare of sunshine and publicity is in City Hall in keeping the public’s business public. Yet, the anti-sunshine gang in City Hall is intensifying  its savage attack on the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force.

The Sunshine Ordinance established the Sunshine Task Force to serve as the people’s court for hearing citizen complaints on public access, thus giving  citizens a way to get secret records, open secret meetings, and hold government officials accountable. It empowers citizens to be watchdogs on issues they care about.  It is the first and best ordinance of its kind in the country, if not in the world, and its effectiveness is shown by the fact that the anti-sunshine gang regularly tries  to bounce strong members and gut the task force.

Terry Francke, then the executive director of the California First Amendment Coalition and author of the ordinance, and I as a founder anticipated this problem in trhe early 1990s and put a mandate  into the original ordinance for the task force to have representatives from the local chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists (a journalist and media attorney) and the San Francisco League of Women Voters, two organizations with experience and tradition with open government issues. Later, the mandate included a representative from New America Media, to insure a member of color for the task force.

 I served for 10 years on the task force and then Mayor Willie Brown made the point about City Hall interference by targeting me for extinction.  He tried several times  to kick me off the task force.  I refused to budge, on the principle that neither the mayor nor any other city official should be able to arbitrarily kick off a member of the task force for doing his/her job. When Willie left office, I left the task force when my term was up  and the principle was intact.

Today, as Richard Knee writes in his timeline and chronology below, the principle is once again under city hall attack. Knee replaced me as the journalist representative  of SPJ and has served under fire  for a record 12 years. He writes that the latest attack is retaliation for a unanimous finding by the task force in September 2011 when Board President David Chiu and Supervisors Scott Wiener, Malia Cohen, and Eric Mar violated  local and state open meeting laws by ramming through the monstrous Park Merced redevelopment contract with 14 pages of amendments that Chiu slipped in “literally minutes” before the committee vote.

This was a historic task force vote in the public interest, and a historic vote for open government and for all the good causes. But instead it prompted a smear- dilute-and- ouster campaign by the Board of Supervisors, with timely assists from the city attorney's office.  The ugly play by play follows. The good news is  that the sunshine forces inside and outside city hall are fighting back, hard and fast, and with a keen eye on all upcoming elections.   Stay tuned. On guard. :

 Special  chronology and timeline detailing the anti-sunshine gang attack on  the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. By Richard Knee)

1. In April 2011, the Task Force voted to change its bylaws to declare that approval of substantive motions required “yes” votes from a simple majority of members present rather than a simple majority of all members, as long as a quorum was present. The quorum threshold remained at six. The bylaws change went against the advice of the city attorney’s office, which pointed to city Charter Sec. 4.104. Suzanne Cauthen and I cast dissenting votes on the bylaw change. David Snyder was absent from that meeting but made it clear that, reluctantly, he could find no reason to disagree with the city attorney’s opinion.

2. In September 2011, the Task Force voted, 8-0, to find that Board of Supervisors President David Chiu and Supervisors Eric Mar, Scott Wiener and Malia Cohen had violated the Sunshine Ordinance and the state’s open-meeting law (Brown Act). Mar, Wiener and Cohen served on the board’s Land Use and Economic Development Committee, which voted to recommend approval of a Parkmerced redevelopment contract. Literally minutes before the committee voted, Chiu introduced 14 pages of amendments to the contract. The deputy city attorney at the meeting opined that the amendments did not substantially alter the contract and therefore the description of the item on the meeting agenda was still apt and the committee could act on it. The full board approved the contract the same day.

Wiener tried to intimidate the Task Force from hearing the case. His legislative aide Gillian Gillette (now the mayor’s director of transportation policy) told us we had no business telling the board how to vote and that in taking up the matter, we would be overstepping our authority. Her tone of voice, facial expression and body language were clearly confrontational. We pushed back. Bruce Wolfe told her it was inappropriate to prejudge the Task Force’s vote before the hearing had begun. I told her that we were not interested in the LUED Committee’s or the board’s substantive vote on the contract, but we were concerned about the procedural aspect. A complaint alleging sunshine violations had been brought before us and we were duty-bound to hear it. I pointedly suggested she review the ordinance, especially Sec. 67.30, which defines the Task Force’s, duties, powers and composition. She skulked back to her seat, seething.

Chiu’s legislative aide Judson True told us that Chiu’s office had made a mad scramble to get the amendments printed and properly distributed to allow enough time for review by the supervisors and members of the public before the committee’s vote. He and Gillette, citing the city attorney’s opinion, reiterated that the committee and the board had followed proper procedure.

We were incredulous toward their claims that (a) 14 pages of amendments did not substantially alter the contract and (b) there was sufficient time to review the amendments before the committee’s vote. We consensed that there was no reason the committee could not have delayed its vote in order to allow adequate review time.

3. Wiener surreptitiously asked the Budget and Legislative Analyst in late 2011 to survey every city department on how much sunshine compliance was costing it. When we learned about it, Task Force Chair Hope Johnson sent a strongly worded letter objecting to the attempt at secrecy and to the form that the survey took; we felt many of the questions were vague or vacuous.

4. In May 2012, the Rules Committee (Jane Kim, Mark Farrell, David Campos) interviewed Task Force applicants. Committee members pointedly asked incumbents Suzanne Manneh (New America Media’s nominee), Allyson Washburn (League of Women Voters’ nominee), Hanley Chan, Jay Costa and Bruce Wolfe if it wouldn’t have been wise to follow the city attorney’s advice in order to avoid violating the Charter. They responded that while they deeply appreciated having a deputy city attorney at Task Force meetings and certainly gave due weight to the DCA’s counsel, such advice did not have the force of law, they had a right to disagree with it and they believed the bylaw change they had enacted in April 2011 did not violate the Charter.

The Rules Committee voted unanimously to recommend the appointments of newcomers Kitt Grant, David Sims, Chris Hyland and Louise Fischer, and returnee David Pilpel. Campos and Kim voted to recommend Wolfe’s reappointment; Farrell dissented.

Then, citing concerns about lack of “diversity,” Farrell and Kim said the Society of Professional Journalists, NAM and the LWV should have submitted multiple nominations for each of their designated seats. They pointed to language in ordinance Sec. 67.30(a) stipulating that the respective members “shall be appointed from … names” – and they emphasized the plural, “names” – “submitted by” the organizations. And the committee voted unanimously to continue those four appointments to the call of the chair.

It is important to note that this was the first time ever that the committee had made a multiple-nominations demand. Previously, the committee and the board had invariably accepted the single nominations from the three organizations.

The “diversity” argument was a smokescreen. They had already voted to bounce Chan, who is Chinese-American, and Manneh is a Palestinian-American fluent in Arabic and Spanish.

The truth was, they didn’t like the nominees. SPJ had nominated attorney Ben Rosenfeld and Westside Observer editor Doug Comstock. Both as a Task Force member and as a political consultant, Comstock had been a thorn in lots of local politicians’ and bureaucrats’ sides. And Manneh and Washburn had participated in the Task Force’s unanimous finding of violation against Chiu, Wiener, Mar and Cohen.

Upshot: By continuing those appointments, the committee and the board ensured that Manneh, Washburn and I would remain as “holdovers” and the SPJ-nominated attorney’s seat would stay vacant (Snyder had formally resigned). Manneh, citing an increased professional and academic workload, stepped aside a few months later, meaning two of the 11 seats were vacant, and it now took only four absences instead of five to kill a quorum.

5. At the subsequent meeting of the full board, after Campos moved to reappoint Wolfe, Wiener moved to replace his name with that of Todd David. In making his motion, Wiener delivered a scorching, mendacious attack on what was then the current Task Force. Details of the tirade are available on request. The board voted, 6-5, in favor of Wiener’s motion (ayes: Wiener, Chiu, Farrell, Cohen, Carmen Chu and Sean Elsbernd; noes: Campos, Kim, Mar, John Avalos and Christina Olague). The board then voted unanimously to appoint Grant, Sims, Hyland, Fischer, Pilpel and David.

6. Ordinance Sec. 67.30(a) stipulates that the Task Force shall at all times have at least one member with a physical disability. Wolfe was the only applicant in 2012 to meet that criterion. So when the board ousted him, the Task Force no longer had a physically disabled member. The city attorney advised the new Task Force that to take any actions before a new physically disabled member was appointed could land land the Task Force and its individual members in serious legal trouble. So the Task Force was sidelined for five months, finally resuming business in November 2012 following the appointment of Bruce Oka -- who, by the way, is solidly pro-sunshine.

            7. After interviewing 12 of the 13 task force applicants on May 15, 2014, Rules Committee members Norman Yee and Katy Tang complained about a lack of racial/ethnic diversity among the candidates, but that didn’t stop them from voting to recommend the reappointments of members David, Fischer and Pilpel, all Anglos (Campos was absent). Nor were they deterred by the fact that David has missed six task force meetings since March 2013, including those of last January, February and April. They continued consideration of additional appointments to a future meeting, possibly June 5.

At the board meeting on May 20, Wiener repeated his slander of the 2012-14 task force and heaped praise on David, Fischer and Pilpel without offering a shred of corroborating evidence. The board voted to confirm their reappointments, again ignoring David’s porous attendance record.

8. To be seen: whether Rules and/or the board will continue insisting on multiple nominations, and whether it will move forward on other possible appointments. Including Grant’s resignation and the possibility of holdovers, there is a risk that as few as eight of the 11 seats will be filled, meaning three absences would kill a quorum. Sims is moving to Los Angeles but remaining as a holdover for the moment. If he resigns, that could pull the number of fill seats down to seven, meaning two absences would kill a quorum.

The foregoing commentary is strictly personal and not intended to reflect the views of any other individual or organization.

Respectfully submitted,

Richard Knee

Member (since July 2002) and past chairman of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force

Member of the Society of Professional Journalists, Northern California Chapter, Freedom of Information Committee

San Francisco-based freelance journalist

(The Bruce blog is written and edited by Bruce B. Brugmann, editor at large of the San Francisco Bay Guardian. He is the former editor and co-founder and co-publisher of the Guardian with his wife Jean Dibble, 1966-2012). In San Francisco, the citizens are generally safe, except when the mayor is in his office and the board of supervisors is in session. You can quote me.  B3


Jason Grant Garza here. Read my story and be ready to TASTE THE HYPOCRISY and SMELL THE LIES of the city's establishment which has seen to DISMISS my case NUMEROUS TIMES despite the fact - I'm right. Watch my YOUTUBE videos and be prepared to have YOU WORLD ROCKED.

Posted by Jason Grant Garza on May. 29, 2014 @ 2:04 pm

Jason Grant Garza here ... again thanks for the attempt at imitation ... here is the SIGNED confession .... and here is (note the date 9-4-2002 and note "Earlier in the hearing, Garza told the task force its rulings "don't amount to a hill of beans" if no one in the city will enforce or abide by them. Task force members responded that their new committee, the Compliance and Amendments Committee, will strive to monitor compliance and recommend enforcement. Members of the committee will be Heather Sterner (chair), Richard Knee, and Alexandra Nickliss. "
Oh and here is the latest video from the MINISTRY .... .... did the MINISTRY find DPH or Gleghorn in violation for having told the MINISTRY in the May 2, 2012 hearing that after speaking with the City Attorney I would have to sign? Go to the MINISTRY'S website and listen to the audio ...the part starts at the 4 hours and 12 minute section.

In addition to this wonderful article in regard to what happened to cause the NUCLEAR WINTER at the MINISTRY (6 months closed in 2012) please look at the videos in youtube with me going to the Clerk of the BOARD of Supervisors to discuss and videotape.

Learn the GAMES, watch the INHUMANITY and NOTE the MINISTRY still is ineffectual ... HOW many years later? What 12 years of service ( no results .... .... Fourteen times the task force has asked Ethics for action, and 14 times those cases have been dismissed - with little serious investigation) and still offering false hope and false unaccountable no result process? Go to for some insightful comments.

So HOW much MONEY $$$$ has the MINISTRY saved the CITY as its SHILL since there is NO ENFORCEMENT only delay, harm, incorrect process and NO accountability. (Oh that is RIGHT) .... I did not lie to the MINISTRY in 2012 but then I was NOT expecting them (the MINISTRY) to do RIGHT and hold people accountable .... listen to the 5/19/14 Hearing video listed above. Oh and by the way AM I NOT the ONE explaining to the MINISTRY the LACK of DUE PROCESS based on their RIGGED voting procedure? Again correct, in 2002 correct, in 2006 correct, in 2010 correct, in 2012 correct and in 2014 correct ... now ask yourself .... how will your flattery change the TRUTH?

Posted by Jason Grant Garza on May. 29, 2014 @ 2:53 pm


Posted by Jason Grant Garza on May. 29, 2014 @ 3:00 pm

One would think that the purge of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (SOTF) would have rendered it more acceptable to the Board of Supervisors and the allies they appointed to it. Not so for SOTF appointees David Pilpel and Todd David.

At the April 28 Ethics Commission meeting (1:31:30 on video) Mr. Pilpel presented himself as an emissary from SOTF rather than a private citizen. He warned of a "procedural problem" in a case referred by the SOTF to Ethics that "does not tell you the full story". Contrary to the SOTF findings, he asserted that the violation reported was "not willful" and that the due process afforded to the respondent wasn't "sufficient". He lamented the SOTF's lack of "clarity on what steps needed to happen" before referring a case to Ethics and pleaded to the Commissioners;"I'm fighting a losing battle over there". He went on; "I've spent a huge amount of time preparing findings and explanations that I think would have been helpful as part of the referral that the Chair (Kitt Grant) elected not to use". Therefore, he declared, what his SOTF peers sent to Ethics "was not helpful". At the Board's Rules Committee meeting on May 15, Mr. Pilpel re-iterated that the SOTF did not seem to understand "where due process is attached". Magic words for re-appointment.

Also weighing in at the 5/15/14 Rules Committee meeting was Mr. Todd David (1:57 on the video) who turned on the SOTF to excuse his poor attendance record. After mentioning his family obligations, Mr. David revealed that the SOTF was "shifting around dates" and rescheduling regular meetings because other members said; "Oh, I'm not going to be in town that day". He had been left in the lurch because "there wasn't an easy predictability of when meetings were scheduled". (The SOTF attendance record shows that regular meetings were canceled due to Holidays, and 6 of Mr. David's 7 absences were unexcused).

Mr. David then confided; "If you look at a lot of the votes...I'm the one independent thinker on the Task Force...the one dissenting vote". He revealed that "It's very easy to be a member of the Task Force...if you... get into this type of Group Think." Unlike the other SOTF members, however; "I try to think independently of the merits of (the case)".

These two gentlemen were re-appointed to battle the SOTF demons they perceive - and that some Supervisors need - to justify an anti-Sunshine vendetta. There will always be more to purge if SOTF appointees make their colleagues look bad in order to make themselves look good.

Posted by Guest Derek Kerr on May. 29, 2014 @ 7:47 pm

Supervisor Katy Tang lamented the lack of diversity amongst the SOTF applicants and then proceeded NOT to appoint the minority applicant from New American Media or Bruce Wolfe the only disabled applicant. Instead Supervisor Tang voted for 3 white applicants!!! Even she must realize the duplicitous disconnect between her words & her actions.

Tang also insisted every SOTF applicant swear allegiance to the City Attorney to be considered. Isn't government supposed to serve the citizens rather than the other way around? Shouldn't Tang have asked each applicant to swear allegiance to the citizens they will serve? Evidently not relevant in the minds of the anti-Sunshine gang.

Posted by Maria Rivero on May. 30, 2014 @ 6:04 am

reason other than that you haven't hired anyone of that race yet.

Posted by Guest on May. 30, 2014 @ 6:40 am

Jason Grant Garza here ... and what happens when the city attorney gives them incorrect and wrong advise? For example Hipaa regulations ... ??? Did the incorrect city attorney pay for damages, delay and harm that was caused when DPH's EXPERT in Hipaa testified in May 2, 2012 in front of the MINISTRY clearly stating that after checking with the city attorney that my signature on a Hipaa release WAS required for me to get my OWN medical records and now the change at the 5/19/14 hearing? The city attorney and DPH has made an "allowance?" Interestingly enough when I followed up (see youtube video 5/29/14 - Gleghorn) I was informed that there is no "Exception Clause" policy for the 1% as expressed to SOTF on 5/19/14. Yes ... ANY port in the STORM except accountability, correct procedure and HUMANITY.

In addition on 5/19/14 when (at the end of Gleghorn video) Mr. Okra asks the city attorney whether or NOT my own medical records are public records. Watch the response ... deferral ... so then again as was apparent ... DCA stated that he could offer NO OPINION and that it was up to the task force to decide when weighing. Learn the GAMES and watch the INHUMANITY.

This is almost as funny as the claim that BOS wants to fix and have a viable SOTF.
Actions SPEAK louder than WORDS. Oh and what happened in the cases mentioned in the article ... did 10048 go to ETHCIS )Park Merced) and what was the outcome? What was the outcome of case # 12056 that was sent to ETHICS? Ha,ha,ha.

Could it have been the same as my Nurse Ratch case that got sent to ETHICS (no results)

Or could it be different than the city attorney's witch hunt against Ross (Sheriff) in front of ETHICS where the "STANDARD" was changed for Ross and see what we get? You know sort of like the SOTF changing the voting rules for DUE PROCESS then changing them back thereby disallowing DUE PROCESS?

Learn the GAMES and watch the INHUMANITY.

One last question would that be the same city attorney that had my case dismissed 2003 with fraud and testilying (C02-3485PJH) for denial of emergency services(Patient Dumping) in 2001 and then in 2007 signed a confession admitting fault and guilt with the Office of Inspector General and it is NOW 2014 and NO ONE from the city attorney, DPH, the courts, SFPD nor Sheriff have explained? ... oh YEAH ... it is the same CITY ATTORNEY and by the way is he NOT suing Nevada for Patient Dumping? What was the signed confession for?

Posted by Jason Grant Garza on May. 30, 2014 @ 6:54 am

and the NUMEROUS times my CASE has been DISMISSED are WRONG. There is a VAST conspiracy against me - I've been told by PEOPLE IN THE KNOW that PRESIDENT OBAMA was briefed on my case by SENATOR FEINSTEIN as a THREAT to the ENTIRE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES!

Watch the inhumanity, TASTE THE LIES!

Posted by Jason Grant Garza on May. 30, 2014 @ 9:02 am

As an owner of a ferret for 18 years, she has a wealth of knowledge that she like
s to share with others. Try to reward your animal whenever they respond or
pay heed to your voice when you utter out their name.
Children will love that Toffee the pony loves to be fussed over and pampered.

Posted by crimsonchilla on Aug. 03, 2014 @ 7:41 am

DR odudu is the only Dr who could ever get my HIV-AIDS cured with his healing spell, i have tried almost everything but i couldn’t find any solution on my disease, despite all these happening to me, i always spend a lot to buy HIV drugs from hospital and taking some several medications but no relieve, until one day i was just browsing on the internet when i come across a great post of !Nicole! who truly said that she was been diagnose with HIV and was healed that very week through the help of these great powerful healing spell doctor, sometime i really wonder why people called him Papa Odudu, i never knew it was all because of the great and perfect work that he has been doing that is causing all this. so i quickly contacted him, and he ask me some few questions and he said a thing i will never forget that anyone who contacted him is ! always getting his or her healing in just 6 hours after doing all he ask you, so i was amazed all the time i heard that from him, so i did all things only to see that at the very day which he said i will be healed, all the strength that has left me before rush back and i becomes very strong and healthy, this disease almost kills my life all because of me, so i will to hospital to give the final test to the disease and the doctor said i am HIV negative, i am very amazed and happy about the healing Dr Odudu gave to me from the help of his ancient herbs if you have any question for me concerning all i have said email me at: But if you feel like contacting Dr Odudu at once you can email him now for your own healing too at: or call his phone number which is +2347031548325 for direct contact good luck i am Hilton Anderson...

Posted by Hilton on May. 30, 2014 @ 2:17 pm

My Name is suzan, From london. I wish to share my testimonies with the general public about what this man called odudu prince has just done for me , this man has just

brought back my lost Ex husband to me with his great spell, I was married to this man called john we were together for a long time and we loved our self’s but when I

was unable to give him a child for 7 years he left me and told me he can’t continue anymore then I was now looking for ways to get him back until a friend of mine told

me about this man and gave his contact email( then you won’t believe this when I contacted this man on my problems he prepared this spell cast

and bring my lost husband back, and after a month I miss my month and i go for a test and the result stated am pregnant am happy today am a mother of a baby girl,

thank you once again great odudu prince for what you have done for me, if you are out there passing through any of this problems listed below:

1) If you want your ex back.
(2) if you always have bad dreams.
(3) You want to be promoted in your office.
(4) You want women/men to run after you.
(5) If you want a child
(6)If you need an HIV cure
(7) You want to tie your husband/wife to be
yours forever.

you can call his phone as we +2347031548325

Posted by suzan on May. 30, 2014 @ 2:25 pm


Ever thought about giving some of the $$$ you made selling the SFBG property to a for-profit company back to the weekly newspaper?

The weekly newspaper is struggling and could use a cash infusion from you.

Posted by Guest on May. 31, 2014 @ 11:52 am


Ever thought about giving some of the $$$ you made selling the SFBG property to a for-profit company back to the weekly newspaper?

The weekly newspaper is struggling and could use a cash infusion from you.

Posted by Guest on May. 31, 2014 @ 11:53 am

had a future he would not have sold his.

Posted by Guest on May. 31, 2014 @ 1:11 pm

Hello let me give this testimony to the public about a great man who help me out in serious illness. I had HIV AID for good 5 years and I was almost going to the end of my life due to the way my skin look like all I have in my mind is let me just give up because life was not interested to me any longer but I just pray for God every day to accept my soul whenever I’m gone lucky to me my kid sister ran to me that she found a doctor in the internet who can cure HIV/AIDS she helped me out on everything the man ask for my picture, so he can cast a spell on me from his temple after all he ask is done 45mins later I started getting more stronger my blood started flowing normally for 4 to 5 days I start getting Weight before a month my body start developing my skin start coming up after 2month I went for HIV test and I was tested negative I’m so happy that I can say I’m not a HIV patient if you have HIV/AIDS or any sickness please for your sake contact DR MAXI OWOLABI for cure now on,

Posted by emma jurgens on Jun. 01, 2014 @ 10:13 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.